This is awesome! I’m gonna scan my parent’s wedding photos to color and make them surprised!
FULL TUTORIAL: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jf/hand-colouring-a-black-and-white-photo/hand-colouring-a-black-and-white-photo.html
This is awesome! I’m gonna scan my parent’s wedding photos to color and make them surprised!
FULL TUTORIAL: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jf/hand-colouring-a-black-and-white-photo/hand-colouring-a-black-and-white-photo.html
Unlike high school, getting a reputation online as an artist isn’t easy. We can’t just smile and charm our fans and potential customers with our good looks. Sure they might stop by and admire your stuff, but chances are they’re not going to be buying anything unless they end up feeling a real connection to you, not as an artist, but as a human being.
Let’s be honest here, people can get good-looking art or decent sounding music virtually anywhere these days, which is why nobody’s really looking to go out and buy another piece of art to hang up on their wall or another book to shove in their bookcase — what they are really wanting to buy is a story. This might be a real story that you tell them about how a particular piece of art came to be along with the thought process and motivations behind its creation, or it could also be the story of you.
It’s not enough to be the best at what you do; you must be perceived as the only one who does what you do. ~Jerry Garcia
This second type of story, however, is far more important because it’s not a story that you tell directly, but it’s a story that is told about you by other people. This is your reputation as an artist. It could be good story, it could be not-so-good story, or there could be no story yet to tell (i.e. they’ve never heard of you). Either way, it’s up to you to create, build, and then maintain this reputation throughout your career. Great artists such from Warhol, Versace, Dali, Picasso, Hemmingway, Twain, John Lennon, Bob Dylan, Jerry Garcia, to Lady Gaga understood the value of creating a very specific reputation for themselves. We’ll talk a little bit about how we can create this type of reputation in a minute, but first we need to take a closer look at some of the reasons people would choose to buy something online from one person but not someone else.
The internet offers us as some unprecedented opportunities, as well as some unique challenges to selling our creative work online. Since most of our customers will never meet us face to face, they have to base their decision on what we say or do online.
Think about this for a moment. When you’re looking to buy that new book or DVD online, are you more likely to buy it from a site like Amazon or from a site called MovieTimeRUs. Chances are you are going to go with Amazon because most of us have not only heard of Amazon, but we also instinctively trust them because we know they’ve already had millions of satisfied customers. This is called “social proof” which essentially means that if everyone else is doing it, then it must be okay.
Unfortunately, there is no universal e-Bay like feedback rating system for us as creative professionals, people who buy our work rarely write reviews or testimonies about our greatness. So instead we have to rely on our word-of-mouth reputation as well as our charming personality.
But what if no one knows who I am?
This turns out to be the real secret of online success for the individual artist. When it comes to buying something like art, writing, or music we want to buy from someone we know and like. Again, we can find good art/music/writing anywhere these days so what often makes the difference between one artist and another is how we feel about them. [Keep in mind that I’m using the term “Artist” here to describe any kind of creative professional]
Okay Dale Carnegie, so how do I get these people to like me?!
We do this by first creating an online home where our future friends and fans can stop by and get to know us a little better. It can’t just be a one-way conversation either, which is why we have to find ways to interact with our visitors and show them what a cool cat we really are.
Give what you have. To someone else it may be better than you dare to think. ~Henry W. Longfellow
We also have to share something of value with them. This could be a story, an idea, a resource, etc.. The point here is that we have to give them something other than our sales pitch when they drop in for a visit because nobody likes to get the Amway ambush when they’re just stopping by for a cup of coffee.
Finally, we have to find a way to connect and grow our own circle of friends by going out and visiting our neighbors once in awhile. After all, it’s kind of hard to meet new people if you never actually leave your virtual house. Go out there and explore the online world around you. If you take the time to look around, I think you’ll discover that there really are some cool kids out there to hang with.
Let’s take a closer look at each of these steps:
Your online reputation builds slowly but can fall apart quickly
It takes time and persistance to build your online reputation as an artist. It’s not a one week, one month, or even a one year kind of deal. Not only does it take years to build this reputation, you also have to guard it carefully because it often only takes one act of stupidity in order to destroy it.
I was reminded of this fact recently when I read about Thomas Kinkade the world-famous artist who spent years carefully creating his reputation as this moral and religious “painter of light” only to see it come crashing down around him with a fraud and public bankruptcy hearing and more recently a DUI arrest.
The lesson here may be that in a world where news travels around the world within minutes, we cannot afford to risk our reputation as an artist. Luckily, it turns out that the easiest way to protect your reputation is simply to . . .
Be Real.
Be Yourself.
Support Others.
Live your Art.
.
How are you building your reputation online?
(from Skinny Artist http://skinnyartist.com/how-to-create-and-destroy-your-reputation-as-an-artist/)
We should never underestimate the power of art. Through the history, art have always been very closely intertwined with current trends and events in society. Now in the digital era and the time of what’s called Web 2.0 there are new trends and tendencies. The power in the art industry has shifted from powerful art personas to masses and consumers are producers at the same time. It has opened new opportunities for artist of different genres and directions that were never officially appreciated before.
Newly emerged trend within art on the internet in Web 2.0 era is emergence of so called “Pro-consumers”, it happens when a single person becomes consumer and producer at the same time. Flickr can be seen as an example, I register to use the service and I am also consumer of the service provided by the site and in return I upload my product- artworks or images displaying my photo editing or photography skills.
Another new tendency that is brought on by Web 2.0 in online arts is that the largest proportion of innovations comes from amateur artists. Professional and well established artists no longer rule the world of art; they might set the trend or give a starting point to new ideas. However, all the progressive and innovative ideas come from the amateur pool of submitted material, selected and voted for by their peers.
The mentioned above development is leading society to development of ‘Ochlocracy ‘. Definition of Ochlocracy in the dictionary is “governed by the masses”. Meaning now society with the means of tagging, liking and commenting chooses trends, favorite artists and popular trends in art. Now society is deciding what is in fashion, not the professional artists who want to promote their brand or product. This collective intelligence acts like a filter for these enormous amounts of information floating on the internet. This is just like natural selection just on the internet. Also things like tagging, re-tweeting help organize the content on the web, to provide users with more convenient search.
I reckon that the Web 2.0 encourages differences, variety and diversity rather than homogeneity. It comes from the ability of all kinds of people freely expressing their opinion and making their own choices regarding what they consider art. All variations or modifications are appreciated and valued within internet world. These days difference is good, newness is better, people come out and show their talents because these days it is actually appreciated and we have a privilege to enjoy some amazing arts.
Along with positive change brought on by Web 2.0 that enabled unique and rapid development of art. This became possible through artists being able to showcase their works and talent freely, however, this lead to enormous amounts of information circulating online. Every single piece of artwork comes from the artist’s soul; it showcases their personality and life experience. And we’ve come to experience “the big brother phenomena” where some people provide a lot of irrelevant personal information. In contrast there are people who show unhealthy interest and fascination with other people’s insights into their private lives.
So in the end, I would say that the opportunities provided by Web 2.0 have brought tremendous change on the development of art in general and art on the internet in particular. The change has been mostly positive despite some minor shortcomings like “big brother effect”, when internet users upload irrelevant personal information. Except that, great number of artists got to showcase their talent and their works, and every single difference is appreciated, all the styles and directions in art matter.
References
Prada, J 2009, Web 2.0 as a new context for artistic practices, The Fibreculture Journal, retrieved from <http://fourteen.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-098-web-2-0-as-a-new-context-for-artistic-practices/>on 30 September 2012.
Dovey, J and Lister, M 2009, Straw Men or Cyborgs, Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.1-18, retrieved on 30 September 2012.
Compared to other forms of art, Internet Art (aka Net Art) is a form of art that few are familiar with. My internet-savvy mother (as I reckoned, she knows how to get the most out of the online world rather than her peers) was asked whether has she heard of the term ‘Internet Art’, yet, she’s got trouble of figuring out what it is or finding an example of it. This is understandable, considering that it has only been in existence for just over a decade, since the invention of the Internet and the expansion of digital technology.
Very interesting, after being given of some examples of Internet Art, my mum was very surprised that some of them she encounters everyday that she doesn’t even know. And the examples are those Interactive Google Doodles that you see on the homepage which replace the standard logo to celebrate holidays, anniversaries, special events and other important days. These are 5 interactive Google Doodles that I find interesting.
It is not a secret that since the time immemorial people strived for beauty and perfection. Nowadays, digital citizens acknowledge the benefits of digital photography since the process of modifying one’s appearance has been significantly simplified with the advent of this marvelous invention. Thus, it is difficult to disagree with Jose van Dijk arguing that “the endless potential of digital photography to manipulate one’s self- image seems to make it the ultimate tool for identity formation” (2008, p. 12).
Very few of us do not seek to improve both seeming and obvious defects in our appearance. We always find those defects unpleasant therefore, the dismay when capturing our pictures is not an uncommon thing. Correcting hairdo, smiling and making a happy facial expression are only some contrivances people resort to, in order to look more attractive in the photos. As for digital camera, it can be compared with a magic stick, whose waving improves one’s appearance within a second. At present, this magical digital tool may improve not only the appearance, but a personal self-esteem. By erasing pimples, or retouching the dark circles under the eyes, a person reveals his or her hidden need for self-expression.
Consequently, self-idealization, which is manifested through upgrading self-images, is directly linked to the desire to look better. And accessibility of techniques (you can even find loads of online tutorial on internet) that help people manipulate their images only reinforces this desire. Within couple of seconds, the display of the digital camera provides us with a tangible result. There is no trouble just to delete the unsuccessful images. Moreover, at our computers all the photos are susceptible to editing, which also contributes to simplification of the entire process. Suffice it to stretch a hand and erase all the negative features so easily.
Thus, by means of Photoshop software it is possible to create ideal pictures. The ideal faces and bodies are, as usual, are not perceived as something unnatural or artificial. They are just a result of modification and correction. Nonetheless, very few realize the fact that their understanding of the “ideality” and “perfectness” were imposed by those, who earlier distributed the pictures of models with flawless appearance in magazines or throughout the Internet. Subsequently, people try their best to modify their appearance to fit their idealized mental images (Dijk 2008).
These improved photos are being shared on Twitter, Facebook, or Tumblr. These photos are a source of their owners’ pride. And the most appalling thing is that most of us are not concerned about showing the better side of ourselves (Dijk 2008). Its vanity and assumed necessary to match the idealized images that pushes people to make digital masterpieces out of them. Therefore, there is no wonder that so many people daily resort to the services of plastic surgeons. Such surgical intrusion also can be viewed as simply a small modification of one’s appearance. The idea of the perpetual modification can be regarded as a disease of the contemporaneity, which, in its turn, justifies any intervention in human physical appearance. Indeed, our desire to match idealized stereotypes seems to be unconquerable. Refashioning one’s own self-identity is also linked to “normalization” and adoption of similar stereotypes.
Therefore, based on the above facts, it can be stated that the advent of digital photography significantly influenced and even altered human self-perception and self-conception. Undoubtedly, the potential of such useful invention as digital photography to modify our images affected our ability to value natural beauty. So, this potential of digital photography indubitably makes it “the ultimate tool for identity formation” (Dijk 2008, p. 12).
References
Dijk, J 2008, Digital Photography: Communication, Identity, Memory, Visual Communication, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57-76,retrieved from <http://dare.uva.nl/document/138874> on 27 September 2012.
The body is one of the most popular theme in photography through which many photographers have interpreted in a broad sense with many different approaches, issues and styles. I would like to explore, through photography, how the body can refer to gender identity, to be clearer, how the body and its associations reveal the pure aesthetic qualities of the male body.
This project is born as visualization of male body, in the act of representing men and masculinities through doing guy jobs around house. Specifically, the aim of the project is to create visual documentation, bringing greater visibility and confirming the male role stereotypes in our society.
Stereotypes is when you take any group of people and assign them with any trait. Families, friends or mainstream media play a role in helping boys define what it is like to be a man in our society. In most portrayals, male role stereotypes are believed as strong, assertive, avoiding being soft but being aggressive, financial independence, and physical desirability.
It is true that the unadorned body of a man is a powerful vehicle for representing his masculinity thanks to steady shape, vigorous curves, strong biceps or dark skin tone… Furthermore, if they are put in a specific environment such as to be a cowboy, a soldier, a man working in factory, an adventurer, a scientist or simply a guy doing jobs around the house, his manliness can be interpreted through the move of his body, the sturdiness of his arms or even the wince on his face while working.
For this project, I scrutinized on works of many contemporary photographers and they are truly inspirational, namely, Herb Ritts, Robert Mapplethorpe, Michael Coyne and Rui Palha.
About the shots, I took pictures by switching the camera into monochrome mode because I think the monochrome mode may help me to heighten contrast in the picture, it provides shadows and edges, hence reinforce the model’s masculinity and confirm the theme of the project. The model was put in several situations, where he deals with a couple of guy jobs such as operating machine, repairing the car, adjusting the television or deals with drill and brace, that kind of stuff.
For further development, I would say I will spend more time on adjusting the camera for the more suitable focus, aperture and shutter speed. In addition, the model will be put in many situations else, some close-up portraits exploring expressions on the face is also encouraged.
Credit:
Concept: Raymond Joseph Nguyen
Techniques: Lily Tran, Raymond Joseph Nguyen
Model: Nhựt Minh Lí
Rihanna, a set on Flickr.